Tuesday, October 19, 2010

st. augustine on "jersey shore"

I have a confession to make (pun partially intended)--I've watched an episode or four of that stupid show.  I watched it sort of condescendingly, mocking their stupidity but sometimes getting too involved.  I remember at one point actually feeling sorry for a character who got stood up on a date.  "I grieved with them," as St. Augustine would say.

People often think that trashy entertainment is a new phenomenon, when in reality it has likely existed since the beginning of man.  If art is a form of expression, vile art came into existence when the first vile person figured out how to expose his interior filth.  In Augustine's time, this sort of "art" and "entertainment" was substantially worse than it is nowadays, where it was enjoyable to watch two men fight to the death.  But the public of the 4th century also took great interest in filthy fiction, as they do today:
Stage plays also captivated me, with their sights full of the images of my own miseries: fuel for my own fire. . . .  But let us beware of uncleanness, O my soul, under the protection of my God, the God of our fathers, who is to be praised and exalted--let us beware of uncleanness. I have not yet ceased to have compassion. But in those days in the theaters I sympathized with lovers when they sinfully enjoyed one another, although this was done fictitiously in the play. And when they lost one another, I grieved with them, as if pitying them, and yet had delight in both grief and pity. Nowadays I feel much more pity for one who delights in his wickedness than for one who counts himself unfortunate because he fails to obtain some harmful pleasure or suffers the loss of some miserable felicity.  
--St. Augustine's Confessions (Book III, Chapter 4)
Let us beware of uncleanness.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

selective tolerance

I am sick of all the inconsistent drivel being pushed in mainstream media lately.

Put simply, much of the mainstream media strongly endorses the ground zero mosque as a Constitutional right that must be upheld. Simultaneously, the media strongly condemns another person exercising a similar freedom under the same Constitution.  I'm talking about the crazy pastor from Florida who thought it would be a good idea to publicly burn a pile of Qu'ran's and thinks he will live to tell about it.

A clear example of this is Jon Stewart's position on the issues. ((http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-september-8-2010/weekend-at-burnies)) Tonight, Stewart implied that the two were comically unrelated. Of course he has to, or else he'd seem like an inconsistent fool. But the truth is there is no explanation as to why one action should be tolerated and one shouldn't. Since the Ground Zero Mosque was framed as a legal, Constitutional rights issue and sensitivity was thrown under the bus, why isn't the Qu'ran-burning story framed in the same way?

I suspect the reason they are framed differently is so that two different positions can be taken without being blatantly contradictory.

I am not here to say which is right and which is wrong. But you can't be selectively tolerant and still hold any credibility. Pick a philosophy, and stick with it, Stewart.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

change in the air

fall is my favorite season. i think it's the change in the weather and my wardrobe that makes it feel more serious. the youthful, happy go lucky summer is past us and now it's time to get down to business.

a change is in the air. and not the obama kind.